IMHE OpenIR  > Journal of Mountain Science  > Journal of Mountain Science-2013  > Vol10 No.2
Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study
WU Ying-Hsin; LIU Ko-Fei; CHEN Yi-Chin
Corresponding AuthorLIU Ko-Fei
2013-04
Source PublicationJournal of Mountain Science
Volume10Issue:2Pages:293-304
AbstractNumerical simulation has been widely applied to the assessment of debris flow hazards. In East Asia and especially Taiwan, the most widely used numerical programs are FLO-2D and Debris-2D. Although these two programs are applied to the same engineering tasks, they are different in many aspects. These two programs were compared according to their fundamental theories, input and output data, computational algorithms and results. Using both programs, the simulations of a real debris flow with abundant granular material induced by landslides at Xinfa village in southern Taiwan are performed for comparison. The simulation results show that Debris-2D gives better assessment in hazard area delineating and flow depth predicting. Therefore, Debris-2D is better for simulation of granular debris flows.
KeywordDebris Flow Assessment Program Comparison Flo-2d Debris-2d
DOI10.1007/s11629-013-2511-1
Indexed BySCI
Language英语
Citation statistics
Cited Times:28[WOS]   [WOS Record]     [Related Records in WOS]
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/5219
CollectionJournal of Mountain Science_Journal of Mountain Science-2013_Vol10 No.2
Corresponding AuthorLIU Ko-Fei
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
WU Ying-Hsin,LIU Ko-Fei,CHEN Yi-Chin. Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2013,10(2):293-304.
APA WU Ying-Hsin,LIU Ko-Fei,&CHEN Yi-Chin.(2013).Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study.Journal of Mountain Science,10(2),293-304.
MLA WU Ying-Hsin,et al."Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the Application of Assessment of Granular Debris Flow Hazards with Case Study".Journal of Mountain Science 10.2(2013):293-304.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
Comparison between F(13249KB) 开放获取LicenseView Application Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[WU Ying-Hsin]'s Articles
[LIU Ko-Fei]'s Articles
[CHEN Yi-Chin]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[WU Ying-Hsin]'s Articles
[LIU Ko-Fei]'s Articles
[CHEN Yi-Chin]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[WU Ying-Hsin]'s Articles
[LIU Ko-Fei]'s Articles
[CHEN Yi-Chin]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
This file does not support browsing at this time
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.