IMHE OpenIR  > Journal of Mountain Science  > Journal of Mountain Science-2006  > Vol3 No.4
Reconciling local and global agendas in sustainable development: Participatory research with indigenous Andean communities
Robert E. Rhoades; Virginia Nazarea Neef
Corresponding AuthorRobert ER
2006-12
Source PublicationJOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
ISSN1672-6316
Volume3Issue:4Pages:334–346
AbstractThis paper discusses participatory research in the Andes and presents a case study in Cotacachi, Ecuador, where sustainability scientists and indigenous people seek common ground in their respective but drastically different research and social agendas. Participatory research based on Andean experiences pre-dated and inspired much of the later international movement in agriculture, health, and conservation. Andean communities have a long history in demanding that outsiders address the needs of the community as a condition for carrying out scientific or applied activities. What an Andean community, however, sees as relevant may or may not be within the rubric of ‘participatory research’ as it is practiced throughout much of the world. In fact, overzealous participatory researchers are just as bothersome as their predecessors bearing long questionnaires. More important to Andean people is an equitable relationship with researchers and developers in which exchanges of value are made. A distinction between ‘enriching’ and ‘extractive’ research is drawn. In the case of the SANREM project in Cotacachi, Ecuador, scientists carried out enriching research activities of interest to local people as a way to generate social capital for conducting basic research which does not have an obvious, immediate local benefit. The requested research did not have a conventional participatory methodology but provided valuable products (educational opportunity, germplasm, community visualization tools, and information) to the indigenous community in exchange for time and resources to conduct research on more basic natural resource questions. We argue that in the Andean context the key to reconciling the needs of scientists and of local needs is seeking new forms of equitable collaboration which reach beyond the present and now somewhat tired discourse of ‘participation’.
KeywordAndes Indigenous Peoples Participatory Research Sustainability
Language英语
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/6130
CollectionJournal of Mountain Science _Journal of Mountain Science-2006_Vol3 No.4
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Robert E. Rhoades,Virginia Nazarea Neef. Reconciling local and global agendas in sustainable development: Participatory research with indigenous Andean communities[J]. JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE,2006,3(4):334–346.
APA Robert E. Rhoades,&Virginia Nazarea Neef.(2006).Reconciling local and global agendas in sustainable development: Participatory research with indigenous Andean communities.JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE,3(4),334–346.
MLA Robert E. Rhoades,et al."Reconciling local and global agendas in sustainable development: Participatory research with indigenous Andean communities".JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE 3.4(2006):334–346.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
Reconciling Local an(296KB) 开放获取CC BY-NC-SAView Application Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Robert E. Rhoades]'s Articles
[Virginia Nazarea Neef]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Robert E. Rhoades]'s Articles
[Virginia Nazarea Neef]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Robert E. Rhoades]'s Articles
[Virginia Nazarea Neef]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
File name: Reconciling Local and Global Agendas in.pdf
Format: Adobe PDF
This file does not support browsing at this time
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.